How is textile pressure sensing different from film sensors?

Many film-based pressure arrays use polymer layers that can limit breathability or conformability in some applications. Knitted pressure matrices provide an alternative for supported soft and curved interfaces — for example a 225-cell array across a 50×46 cm panel. Resolution, area, and sensitivity are configuration-dependent.

Reported ranges — resolution to 5 mm, loads from ~5 g, over 1,000,000 loading cycles — come from internal characterization and are adjustable per configuration; they describe a capability envelope across setups, not one construction. In a conference-presented repeatability study, a textile socket-pressure system reached a test–retest intraclass correlation above 0.9; agreement against a validated reference sensor is identified as the next step.

Textile pressure mapping

Distributed pressure and force sensing from knitted capacitive textiles — across insoles, seating, and full surfaces.

A MYANT textile pressure mat resolving foot load across its sensing surface

How it's used today

Body-worn / insole

Plantar and interface pressure from footwear or apparel.

Product implementation

Seating & occupant panel

Large-area seat and occupant sensing (e.g. a 225-cell automotive panel).

Development / platform

Mat / surface

Large 3D-contour pressure mapping, up to ~2 m × 1 m.

Development

Load and contact, made visible

Measures how force is distributed across a surface — plantar load, interface pressure, occupant loading — from a breathable knitted sensor, as a map rather than a single point.

How it's built

From the skin-side knit to the electronics that read it — the layers behind the capability.

Interface location: Between a body or object and a surface — an insole, seat, mat, or panel.
Sensing element: Capacitive: a conductive textile plus a dielectric layer.
Textile construction: Knitted cell / array patterns, with adjustable resolution and coverage.
Electronics boundary: Textile matrix + readout electronics; the pressure map is assembled in software.

What the research shows

Independent studies — each result, and exactly what it covers.

View all research

Capacitive knit matrix (capability envelope)
Internal characterization — MyantX Technology Index
Result
A capability envelope reported across identified internal configurations — resolution down to 5 mm, loads from ~5 g, coverage up to ~2 m × 1 m, over 1,000,000 loading cycles, and 15+ wash cycles without degradation.
Tested
Knitted capacitive pressure matrices characterized across resolution, sensitivity, area, and durability.
Scope & limitation
These values come from different matrices and test setups; no single construction is claimed to achieve all of them at once.
Automotive occupant panel
Automotive platform
Result
Occupant and seating pressure mapping from a breathable textile panel.
Tested
A 225-cell (15×15) capacitive panel across a 50×46 cm seat area.
Scope & limitation
A specific panel configuration on the automotive platform.
Lower-limb prosthetic socket
Conference-presented repeatability study
Result
Intraclass correlation of 0.92–0.97 for test–retest repeatability. Agreement against a validated commercial reference sensor is identified as the next step, not yet established.
Tested
Test–retest repeatability of a textile socket-pressure system on a surrogate limb.
Scope & limitation
A conference-presented repeatability result — no journal DOI, and not agreement against a reference standard.

Capacitive knit matrix (capability envelope)
Internal characterization — MyantX Technology Index
Result
A capability envelope reported across identified internal configurations — resolution down to 5 mm, loads from ~5 g, coverage up to ~2 m × 1 m, over 1,000,000 loading cycles, and 15+ wash cycles without degradation.
Tested
Knitted capacitive pressure matrices characterized across resolution, sensitivity, area, and durability.
Scope & limitation
These values come from different matrices and test setups; no single construction is claimed to achieve all of them at once.
Automotive occupant panel
Automotive platform
Result
Occupant and seating pressure mapping from a breathable textile panel.
Tested
A 225-cell (15×15) capacitive panel across a 50×46 cm seat area.
Scope & limitation
A specific panel configuration on the automotive platform.
Lower-limb prosthetic socket
Conference-presented repeatability study
Result
Intraclass correlation of 0.92–0.97 for test–retest repeatability. Agreement against a validated commercial reference sensor is identified as the next step, not yet established.
Tested
Test–retest repeatability of a textile socket-pressure system on a surrogate limb.
Scope & limitation
A conference-presented repeatability result — no journal DOI, and not agreement against a reference standard.

Pressure mapping, answered

Not seeing your question? Talk to the team that would run your program.

Discuss a project

How is textile pressure sensing different from film sensors?
Many film-based pressure arrays use polymer layers that can limit breathability or conformability in some applications. Knitted pressure matrices provide an alternative for supported soft and curved interfaces — for example a 225-cell array across a 50×46 cm panel. Resolution, area, and sensitivity are configuration-dependent.
How accurate is it?
Reported ranges — resolution to 5 mm, loads from ~5 g, over 1,000,000 loading cycles — come from internal characterization and are adjustable per configuration; they describe a capability envelope across setups, not one construction. In a conference-presented repeatability study, a textile socket-pressure system reached a test–retest intraclass correlation above 0.9; agreement against a validated reference sensor is identified as the next step.